This is the story of a struggle – a David and Goliath story if you will – pitting some 400+ elementary school students in Attawapiskat against the Bureaucracy of the Federal Department of Indian and Northern Affairs.
It is the story of a group of elementary aged Children that would like to go to school in an actual school, like they used to have. They currently are forced to go to school, if they wish to go to school at all, in a collection of portables without any of the amenities, or specialized facilities, that other children in Ontario take for granted. The illustration shows the collection of portables currently being called a school! (Click Image to enlarge)
The story begins with two quotations: The first is taken from the Federal Government Website http://ainc-inac.gc.ca. It reads:
“The objective of the Elementary/Secondary Education Program is to ensure that eligible Indians have access to the education programs and services available in public schools in the province in which the reserve is located.”
The second is taken from a response by the Honourable Chuck Strahl, Minister of Indian and Northern Development on January 31st, 2008:
“Education is one of the keys for first nations communities, as it is for all Canadians, as is economic development opportunities.” >.
It is interesting that Mr. Strahl combines education and economic development opportunities in the one sentence. No one in Attawapiskat would disagree with him
But something His Excellency, John Raulston Saul, said in March, 2002 might have some relevance here. He said:
“Something that exists does not go away because we pretend it isn’t there. Much of the last 150 years of our history has been troubled - indeed hobbled - by an almost childlike head-under-the-blanket approach towards the central role of Aboriginals in the ongoing shape of Canadian society.”
So, remove the blanket!
On January 22, 2008, Phil Fontaine, Grand Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, visited Attawapiskat and the Victor Project, a diamond mine that is in the process of opening, and which will employ about 400 workers. The elementary school children took the opportunity to ask the Grand Chief for help. The picture of the children greeting the Grand Chief tells the whole story (click image to enlarge). The text of their address follows:
“Dear Mr Phil Fontaine, national chief for the Assembly of First Nations:
My name is Nelleon, And my name is Chris. We are both Grade 8 students at JR Nakogee School.
On behalf of the students of JR Nakogee school, we thank you for coming to Attawapiskat today to discuss the problem about our new school.
As you can see, we attend school every day in portables. We walk outside to go to gym, computers, and library, even yesterday when it was minus 43 degrees. Not only us, the Grade 8s, but even the students in Junior Kindergarten, who are only 4 years old, have to face this weather every day.
In 2000, we were moved to the portables, and we were told to wait until 2008 for a new school. We were patient, and last week, we were told to wait ANOTHER 5 years. By the year 2013, many of the students of Attawapiskat, will have spent their whole elementary education in portables.
Please, bring our message to the government. Is it not fair that we have to wait so long. We have been patient. But we want a new school.
Mr Phil Fontaine, we thank you again for listening to us today.”
The children do not blame the Minister! No, two Ministers have promised them a new school and Mr. Strahl’s predecessor, Jim Prentice, in a visit to Timmins, said that he would strongly support a new school.
Who then, is delaying the Project?
Is it the Bureaucracy that is miscommunicating with the Minister?
For example, a recent newspaper article quoted a Tony Prudori as saying that in Attawapiskat “we’ve invested more than $3 million for temporary school accommodation there as well as more than $250,000 to modify space in the high school to allow elementary school students to also use the space.” When asked about this statement John Nakogee, Chief Administrative Officer of the Education Authority said,
“I do not know this man, and to the best of my knowledge he has never been at any of the countless meetings we have had on this project. However, it is fact that the $3 million dollars he refers to, did come from the Federal Government, but it was earmarked for repairs to the roof of the contaminated elementary school. It was used by Indian Affairs for the construction of the portables, which was given to a contractor without tender, and without any site preparation, because they said they were only temporary.
As far as the $250,000, I do not know what he is talking about. Certainly, our secondary school was not modified to accommodate elementary school students. Our secondary school is crowded and we have just completed an extension. It is not part of the elementary school.”
When asked about Health and Safety, Mr. Nakogee said that he had thought the inspection was done during the summer when the children were not in school. In any event he does not believe that it will pass a fire inspection, and has asked for one. More on that later!
Other Opinions
It is perhaps relevant that in 2001, an external team of education experts came into the community to do a Comprehensive Assessment of the School Programs offered by the Authority. Their assessment of the temporary accommodation at that time was:
“The temporary accommodations are acceptable as buildings, but totally unacceptable in terms of providing a broad inquiry-based, student-centered, integrated and seamless program. . . . These teaching/learning compromises are a great disservice to the students and teachers, and totally unacceptable in today’s educational environment.”
That was 7 years ago! This past year, a team, involving a former Director of Education and a past president of the Ontario Association of Education Administrative officials, and another former Superintendent of Secondary Schools, were asked to assess the programs at the local Vezina Secondary School. Their conclusion regarding the portable school was:
“The team is of the opinion that the current portable elementary school facility contributes greatly to the age/grade delay of the students. If something is not done quickly, all graduating grade 8 students will have spent their entire elementary school career in portables. This is unconscionable and would not be tolerated by parents in a non-native community. A new elementary school with all student learning and support services integrated under one roof would contribute immeasurably to reducing the age/grade delay, and the ongoing success of the students.”
A collection of temporary buildings MAY not have any health or safety concerns; but health and safety is not the only criteria for a building(s) that can be used as a school for 400+ pupils! The ability of children to obtain a quality education in the buildings provided is still the key criteria!